Position paper for Russian Federation
| Committee: | GA First |
| Topic: | Consolidation of peace through practical disarmament measures |
| Paper text: | |
| The movement of arms to global conflicts is an invisible enemy that seems to permeate existing tensions and create access to unrestricted proliferation. This trafficking creates, within preexisting conflicts, further distress for communities already struggling, and prevents the necessity of nations to resolve conflicts by furthering their ability to continue fighting. The existence of this Committee, the existence of the Security Council, and of the United Nations itself are testament to how important peaceful conflict resolution is and to why this trafficking is so dangerous. When warfare has commenced, no military will cease its fighting simply for the sake peace. Such goals have already been perceived as having passed. What truly causes the need for peaceful conflict resolution is the inability to continue fighting. Once a combatant has used all available resources, they face no other choice than to resort to negotiation, compromise, and communication that will save lives and cease destruction. The moving of weapons into warzones does not further the interest of peace, it furthers the interests of those who benefit from war. Combatants will not stop fighting without a reason. They will fight until they cannot or until there is nothing less to conquer, destroy, and fight. As expressed in Resolution 2171 (2014), it is within the interest of all nations to prevent outside weapons and arms from infiltrating wars. It is the position of the Russian Federation to further the prevention of the trafficking and trade of weapons into conflicts and warzones according to the intention of international law. | |
| Committee: | GA First |
| Topic: | Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction |
| Paper text: | |
| The use of chemical weapons in warfare has provided a unique challenge to the international community since its dawn in its destructive and cruel waves over the trenches of the First World War. For this, the UN's establishment of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and the Organization of the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) have allowed the nations of the globe to aspire to a world where chemical weapons are not used or needed. It has allowed cooperative efforts among the nations through trust and goodwill to peacefully relinquish not only these arms but also their desire to hold and use such arms. Such organization is integral to achieving a less cruel and more secure world. However, this organization, as with all organizations of the global community's peace and security efforts, is only effective and legitimate with the consent of the nations whose arms are to be relinquished and whose industries will be regulated, monitored, and controlled by this organization for the express purpose of good will and gaining the trust of the international community. This regulation is not so simple for the smaller nations with a developing economy and a growing production. These regulations and oversight can unintentionally, or intentionally if abused out of malice, stymie the growth of a nation. Schedule III chemical weapons are not like bullets, or guns, or blades, or bombs. Their most prolific and common purpose of existence is the simple consequences of modern agriculture, industrial production of goods, and the reality of a nation that is in the process of becoming prosperous, a process that all nations understand whether having already experienced such process or currently living such an endeavor. It is the position of the Russian Federation that the spirit of the OPCW and CWC must be upheld, and not target a country for their legal productivity. | |
| Committee: | GA Second |
| Topic: | Agriculture development, food security and nutrition |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation's position on global food security is highly focused on increased food production. Food insecurity was rampant in the Russian Federation in the 1990s due to a fall in livestock production. However, we have taken many steps since then to produce more agricultural products. In 2019, the Russian Federation was the world's third largest producer and largest exporter of wheat, as well as the largest producer of barley. Additionally, in 2018, the Russian Federation declared a $51 billion plan to increase domestic agricultural production. Producing enough food for a rapidly increasing world population is crucial to reducing global food insecurity. We must also enhance agricultural inputs to further contribute to food production. In 2013, the Russian Federation managed several federal programs granting subsidies to local equipment producers, increasing the amount of agricultural machinery from 2013 to 2019. These principles align with two of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, doubling agricultural productivity and increasing investment in agriculture. After having more success focusing on food production, we desire to continue promoting increased agricultural productivity. It is in the world's best interest for the United Nations to partner with us in taking the next steps towards improving global food security. | |
| Committee: | GA Second |
| Topic: | Development cooperation with middle-income countries |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation's position on supporting the development of middle-income countries directly correlates with our own values. The Russian Federation centers policies around people, their freedoms and rights, welfare, and quality of life. We highly value sustainable human development through private and public initiatives geared toward the development of health care systems and education, transport, social protection, and energy infrastructure. The Russian Federation has been an active donor for different countries, including ones affected by emergencies. The UNDP Russia Partnership includes more than 70 completed and occurring projects in 38 countries. Due to these actions, we believe that promoting sustainable development occurs when member states donate as much as they are able. Having a complete understanding of diverse challenges faced by middle-income countries is also a crucial step towards helping them, which is why our trust fund portfolio is specifically centered on gaining knowledge and expertise in developing countries. These trust funds include the ECA Statistical Capacity Building, Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Capacity Development Program, and Public Finance Management. Additionally, our long-term development policy has three key components concerning sustainable development, which are the social, economic, and environmental aspects. Therefore, when we support developing countries, we need to focus on the social and environmental factors, so we can further focus on that country's specific need rather than redefining the country. Overall, we need to actively donate and invest money in the development of middle-income countries, and we will support the other member states in doing so. | |
| Committee: | GA Third |
| Topic: | Rights of indigenous peoples |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation as a country are currently most comfortable with how we combat challenges that our indigenous people face. We are well-educated on the importance and vitality of rights for indigenous people. Our country is proudly home to 40 indigenous groups, and we recognize that 6% of the world population are indigenous people. However, for the betterment of these groups, we abstain from voting for or against this topic. The best way to address this topic is with respect to the jurisdiction of the country they reside with. Present- day, there is a fierce need to preserve the history and culture of indigenous people, that which must also be balanced with the equally necessary respect to state-unity and preservation of sovereignty regarding the policies that benefit the Russian Federation's indigenous population. It's also notable that our indigenous population is a very diverse composition of people, with multiple diverse cultures, traditions and histories. Each of which, we deem are currently still best cared for when they are left to our jurisdiction. Foreign policies have the potential to cause deep divisions to our beloved people, such as unintentionally showing favor to one group over another, or inciting feelings of neglect or resentment among the various different indigenous communities. This could further incite damage to the unity of our state as a whole. Respect among these communities is vital to the unity of our country. However, while we abstain, we hope that future negotiations will take place, and revisions will be made regarding these issues. Our hope is that the revisions encourage the acknowledgement and understanding of our sovereignty as a state over our people. | |
| Committee: | GA Third |
| Topic: | Literacy for life |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation as a whole strives to combat illiteracy. Any movement towards the expungement of illiteracy is a step we are willing to take, as long as it is appropriately respecting the authority of the country governing it. Sovereignty should be respected at all times, and regarding this, illiteracy hinders nation-wide unity. We have seen our fair share of illiteracy and has seen the destruction and setbacks it may cause. Illiteracy is directly responsible for limiting an individual's ability to work, and therefore economic growth. It divides, and creates deeper rooted poverty, holding back great minds from contributing to society. Any divisions of a state must be acted against swiftly and efficiently, or the threat of a fully divided country lies on the horizon. The Russian Federation has known division all too well, and we fight against it fiercely. Unity among a state is the key to the success of that state. Russia, however, sees this as a controversial step against the harmful threat that illiteracy has in store for society. We have already been working with and supporting the literacy efforts from UNESCO. Make no mistake, we support the idea of efficient education and literacy. We recognize the fact that two out of every three women face illiteracy. We also acknowledge the need of the 250 million children who are not getting an education. However, regarding this topic, it is essential that education be government led, so as to respect state-sovereignty. This will allow for greater state-control over the curriculum, which is vital regarding state unity. We are in support of revisions to establish a stronger emphasis on state-sovereignty regarding this topic and are eager to see the conclusions the revisions come to. Our hopes are that these revisions offer specifically a stronger influence of state authority over the topics that are taught, and the push for education would not interfere with families and the traditional roles within them. | |
| Committee: | GA Plenary |
| Topic: | The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation acknowledges the importance of addressing global environmental challenges, particularly those related to climate change and environmental degradation. However, the Russian Federation asserts that environmental policy must respect the principle of national sovereignty and account for each country's unique geographic, economic, and cultural context. Domestically, the Russian Federation has implemented significant measures to reduce pollution and mitigate climate impacts, most notably through the National Ecology Project, which focuses on improving waste management, air and water quality, and promoting sustainable industrial practices. The Russian Federation is also committed to diversifying its energy sources, increasing investments in nuclear and hydropower while remaining a global energy leader. Additionally, the Russian Federation plays a crucial role in Arctic conservation, emphasizing sustainable resource management in this critical region. On the international stage, the Russian Federation is a signatory to the Paris Agreement and has pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30% below 1990 levels by 2030. Russia supports a flexible approach to environmental goals, advocating for solutions tailored to each nation's capacitive and development pathways. Multilateral cooperation through bodies like the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is critical, but should prioritize technological innovation and economic development alongside environmental protection. The Russian Federation is committed to sharing its technological expertise in energy and environmental management with global partners. Going forward, the Russian Federation calls for realistic and technologically driven solutions to environmental challenges, and supports frameworks that allow for regional adaptability. The nation firmly believes that these efforts must balance environmental sustainability with economic growth and uphold each state's right to pursue its development independently. | |
| Committee: | GA Plenary |
| Topic: | Safety and security of humanitarian personnel and protection of United Nations personnel |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation places a high priority on the protection of humanitarian and UN personnel, recognizing their vital role in conflict zones and fragile regions. However, the Russian Federation stresses that such protection must be balanced with respect for national sovereignty. The Russian Federation has actively supported international legal frameworks aimed at ensuring the safety of humanitarian workers, and has played a significant role in UN peacekeeping operations. In conflict zones like Syria, the Russian Federation has coordinated closely with the United Nations to establish safe zones and ensure the safe delivery of humanitarian aid. The Russian Federation is committed to reinforcing existing protocols and all protections while advocating for greater coordination between military and humanitarian operations. In line with this, the Russian Federation proposes international training programs focused on improving security protocols for both peacekeepers and humanitarian workers. Moreover, the Russian Federation is increasingly concerned about the growing threat of cyberattacks targeting humanitarian missions. The Russian Federation urges the UN to develop robust cybersecurity protocols to safeguard digital infrastructure and communication systems, recognizing that much humanitarian work relies on secure data. The Russian Federation stands ready to contribute to both global environmental sustainability and the enhanced protection of humanitarian personnel. It emphasizes pragmatic solutions that respect national sovereignty, foster economic development, and leverage technological innovation to achieve these goals. | |
| Committee: | SC |
| Topic: | The Situation in the Middle East |
| Paper text: | |
| The events that happened on October 7th, 2023, were unacceptable, and the Russian
Federation supports the State of Israel's right to self-defense, however, the events that took
place after the attacks were unjust. The Russian Federation finds the situation in the State of
Israel appalling. The actions that the State of Israel has taken on the people of Palestine is
nothing short of violations of international law. The Russian Federation has always and will
continue to support a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinian people and
wishes for a quick end to the conflict in the Middle East. The Security Council was able to pass
Resolution 2728 which demanded a cease fire during the month of Ramadan, however, the
Council rejected an amendment that was proposed by the Russian Federation for a
permanent ceasefire. The Security Council has also passed SC Resolution 242 which
guarantees the territorial inviolability and political independence of every State in the area,
including the State of Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The Russian Federation
suggests that the United Nations work on a two-state solution, but first this Council needs to
put its selfish political intentions aside and end the conflict in Gaza to achieve peace. In
particular, the Russian Federation would like to remind the Council of the adopted
resolution 2728 (2024) which seeks an immediate ceasefire.
The rapid expansion of settlements by the State of Israel within the West Bank is displacing over two thousand Palestinian people, and even 396 killed as reported by the UN Human Rights Chief. The Russian Federation condemns this rapid expansion of settlements and the displacement of the Palestinian people in the West Bank. A two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinian people should be the primary goal to create a more secure place for all to live. | |
| Committee: | SC |
| Topic: | The Situation in the South China Sea |
| Paper text: | |
| The collective countries of China, Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam have all been competing each other for the various island territories since the 1970s. The Russian Federation calls for a reminder that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which have an agreement on which countries have exclusive rights to resource within their agreed upon areas. The Peoples Republic of China has inserted themselves on synthetic islands to exsert military power in the shared waters. The Russian Federation would like the Peoples Republic of China to accept and acknowledge that the UNCLOS ruled in favor of the Philippines in stating that China has no legal claims to enforce or assert their militarization in the region. Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea in which the countries pledged to respect the United Nations Charter and international laws which are there to promote peace and promote stability in the region. The Peoples Republic of China failed to recognize the territorial claims in the South China Sea and has ignored the arbitration court's ruling which has created military tensions in the area. The Philippines won the arbitration court in 2016 which claimed that China illegally interfered within the Philippe Exclusive Economic Zone. | |
| Committee: | SC |
| Topic: | The Situation in Ukraine |
| Paper text: | |
| The Russian Federation would like to emphasize that the actions taken in Ukraine are to protect ethnic Russians and the rest of the Russian speaking population in the eastern part of Ukraine. The Russian Federation seeks to ensure that the regional security stays strong and is not to be undermined or provoked by NATO or its involvement in the region of Ukraine. The Russian Federation has no desire to escalate conflict and is open to peace talks. The imposed sanctions on Russian Federation are one-sided and damage the ordinary citizen who lives within the Federation. The Russian Federation would like to stress the support for a peaceful resolution but would like to state that with the Western financial support that Ukraine garnishes in weapons and military aid. This only fuels the conflict and increases region instability which creates more tensions and creates a conditioning for a continuous arms race. The failed negotiations with the Ukrainian government are due to not upholding its commitments or addressing Russian Federation security concerns. The Russian Federation recommends negotiating an agreement with Ukraine without the interference of the West. | |
| Committee: | WHA |
| Topic: | Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health |
| Paper text: | |
| no position paper for this topic as we will not have a delegate in this committee | |
| Committee: | WHA |
| Topic: | Public health dimension of the world drug problem |
| Paper text: | |
| no position paper for this topic as we will not have a delegate in this committee | |
| Committee: | HSC-1961 |
| Topic: | The Situation in the Congo |
| Paper text: | |
| In 1961, the Soviet Union was a leading global power, and a main member of the United
Nations, including being a member of the Permanent Five (P5) of the United Nations Security
Council. In this time, we navigated the increasingly complex ideological landscape that the
world was forming, and at its center was their struggle in the Cold War against the United
States of America. We sought to shape the world based on our own socialist principles and
advocated for the spread of anti-imperialist and anti-western movements around the world.
One major place where the Soviet Union advocated this was in the Africa, where we viewed the decolonization process as a vital step toward ending centuries of Western imperial exploitation. During the Congo Crisis, the country descended into violent uprisings and conflicts following their independence. The Soviet Union vocally supports the central government led by Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba, whom we regarded as the Congo's legitimate leader, and seek to protect their sovereignty from rivaling insurgent forces, such as Katanga. The Soviet Union calls for a more decisive response from the UN, and believe their initial response didn't take enough action in supporting Lumumba's government, and advocate for measures that would remove the foreign military forces (mercenaries) that are plaguing the Congo and supporting the Katangese rebels. The Soviet Union also supports the supply of arms and military assistance to Lumumba's government in the meantime. We view this support as essential to preventing the re-establishment of neo-colonial control over the Congo. | |
| Committee: | HSC-1961 |
| Topic: | The Situation in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Paper text: | |
| Latin America has seen abrupt and tumultuous changes in the last decade. The concerns of Guatemalan president Jacobo Arbenz were brought to the Security Council a few years back, and with the blocking of the US, nothing was done, and Arbenz was overthrown, leading to the instability in the region. In Cuba, Fidel Castro and July 26th Movement have successfully established their sovereignty on the Cuban island. The United States has historically been the aggressor of the region, as they were the primary foreign backer of the Batista dictatorship. The Soviet Union will continue to support Cuba as it becomes fully independent from foreign rule. The United States and its allies need to commit itself to non-interventionism and allow nations to decide their own paths of governance, whether these be capitalist, socialist, or other ways of economically and politically organizing a nation-state. | |
| Committee: | HSC-1961 |
| Topic: | Security Council / Secretariat Cooperation |
| Paper text: | |
| The Soviet Union and its representatives are active supporters of the peacekeeping missions in the Congo and other areas. Secretariat Hammarskjöld has been increasing the number of these missions, oftentimes without the direct approval of the Security Council. While we recognize the Secretariat's ambition and dedication to see peace in the world, we also want to reaffirm that the United Nations needs to act as a cohesive unit to foster world peace and mutual development. The Secretariat needs to adhere to the administrative bodies and laws and carry out these missions as approved. | |
Back to the list of countries