Position paper for Belarus
| Committee: | GA First |
| Topic: | Consolidation of peace through practical disarmament measures |
| Paper text: | |
| We strongly support the consolidation of peace through practical disarmament measures.
Furthermore, we advocate for the international community to increase actions towards
specific disarmament measures. Peace is a critical topic, and, to ensure stability and security
globally, we must make this agenda of peace. The First Committee has previously taken
measures to address disarmament measures before. Through UN resolutions, such as
Resolution 74/54, which called for effective disarmament, and Resolution 61/89, which
established the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). These resolutions are essential to consolidate
peace in regions across the world. The UN should promote regional disarmament measures
as a leeway for global security and strengthen specific frameworks.
Global peace can only be achieved by reducing the number of weapons in certain conflict- prone regions. By disarming, we can limit violence and foster trust between surrounding nations. The UN must enhance support for these measures to help consolidate peace, especially in war-prone countries. Expanding programs like the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) and specific resolutions like 74/54 and 61/89 will reduce armed violence. By preventing weapons from reaching sectors, like extremist groups, where the state is not in control. We have disarmed our nuclear arsenal voluntarily through the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NFT) to maintain global security. Our ongoing commitment to consolidate peace through arms disarmament is needed from others. To consolidate peace, we must strengthen previously passed disarmament frameworks to be able to address current conflicts. The UN must initiate new promoting more disarmament mechanisms to be a leeway for global security. These efforts will help reduce violence and create a foundation for global security and peace. | |
| Committee: | GA First |
| Topic: | Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction |
| Paper text: | |
| With regard to the implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction (CWC), we support disciplining states which disregard the ban on chemical weapons. These include stronger sanctions, such as those which limit imports of essential goods, on states that use chemical weapons. Additionally, we support sanctions on states that do not discipline non-state actors within their territory for using chemical weapons. States which are in close proximity to larger states that are actively attempting to expand power and land are greatly threatened by the possibility of chemical weapon usage. Some of these powerful states have signed on to the CWC, but this does not mean we can ignore the possibility of them using these banned weapons. Member states should be aware they will have strong sanctions from multiple states placed on them if they are to use chemical weapons. Additionally, there are four member states which have not signed onto the CWC. We must be able to prevent these states from using chemical weapons, and defend states which may be victim to their usage. States in close proximity to those which are more likely to use these banned weapons must be equipped with the proper deterrents, and should be supported by member states that are in trade agreements with the four non-signees. Though we commend the CWC for effectively aiding in the destruction of 100% of signed member states chemical weapons stockpiles, we must be wary of the threat of reemergence of chemical weapon development and stockpiling, as well as the possibility of non-state actors using these weapons. | |
| Committee: | GA Second |
| Topic: | Agriculture development, food security and nutrition |
| Paper text: | |
| We firmly support improving the general status of agriculture development throughout all
member states of the United Nations in the quickest and most efficient time manner.
Although we want the development to be done quickly, we also believe such
improvement must be thoroughly organized, concise, and coordinated. Agricultural
sectors are a fundamental sector of the economy, as sustainable practices keep it stable
and sufficient. We believe that technological advancements should be pursued, as the
current improvements and increases in these said technologies, infrastructure, and
innovation have shown to be beneficial to the agricultural sector.
Furthermore, we strongly support increasing and strengthening food security, by asking for member states to enact sustainable and sufficient practices with food programs nationally. We believe that food security is in line with agricultural development, as stable food security also advocates for a stronger agricultural sector, therefore increasing development. This also strengthens cooperation with other member states. Lastly, we firmly support increasing nutrition and overall quality of food and goods for member states. Preventing malnutrition and hunger is extremely beneficial to the quality of life amongst citizens. Also, attempting to reduce obesity rates and overall dietary concerns is beneficial to citizens as well. These ideals can be achieved through proper advancements and developments of the agricultural sector, as supported earlier. We urge all member states to increase the overall effectiveness of agriculture development, food security, and nutrition within our respective nations. Increasing development and advancements within these sectors will provide not only a stronger economy, but healthier and an overall better quality of life for citizens. | |
| Committee: | GA Second |
| Topic: | Development cooperation with middle-income countries |
| Paper text: | |
| We firmly believe in furthering relationships and alliances amongst middle-income countries. Throughout history, we have shown that we are willing to work with other countries on both a social and economic level. We have maintained partnerships with several middle-income nations, particularly in trade, industrial development, and technology sectors. For a long time, we have been looking to broaden our trade market beyond our traditional partners. Other middle-income countries present new opportunities for trade partnerships, especially in sectors like agriculture, engineering, and technology. These partnerships could be extremely beneficial for both participating countries and their economies. We encourage member states to increase development with middle-income countries, especially in trade or areas of diplomatic ties. Through targeted partnerships and industrial cooperation, Belarus can be a relevant player in development initiatives with middle-income nations. | |
| Committee: | GA Third |
| Topic: | Rights of indigenous peoples |
| Paper text: | |
| Our nation understands the importance of strengthening the economic and cultural security
of indigenous peoples with respect to international dialogues for human rights. We
recognize General Assembly Resolution 61/925, the Declaration On the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples, where our vote and many others endorsed the moral force that continues to
motivate an urge for progress in affected member states. We are committed to the
principles of self-determination and socio-economic development emphasized in the ICCPR
and ICESCR, which advocate for improved living standards for indigenous groups and all
other populations through sustainable development.
While we recognize and affirm the protections of these frameworks, the matter of implementing encouraged international policies should be considered with nuance and self- determination in the context of each member-state. While appreciating the sacredness of unique cultural practices, we assert that a one-size-fits-all policy and procedure for this agenda will only demean the distinct and wide-ranging needs of sovereign states. Our nation supports the enrichment and integration of indigenous groups with the priority of bringing stability and economic wellbeing to each affected member states people as a whole. We therefore assert that in order to preserve the cultural integrity and self-determination of indigenous groups, the rights of self-determination and individual integrity must be secured for all present member states | |
| Committee: | GA Third |
| Topic: | Literacy for life |
| Paper text: | |
| As a nation, we stand and recognize that literacy is of utmost importance, and that this issue should be at the forefront of priorities at the United Nations. We believe in the importance of building literacy levels to reach high standards, not just for a select number of countries, but on a global scale and particularly those states which lack fundamental resources. There are many states who constantly face set-backs, and these challenges include the lack of technology being integrated in order to bridge gaps that may occur from time to time, as well as the halting of education once formal schooling for kids has been completed. The UN agency UNESCO was set forth to lead in the fight for literacy on a worldwide-scale by launching Implementation of the International Plan of Action for the United Nations Literacy Decade." Already, action has been taken by UN plans such as this, and progress has been made despite the slow pace. Another effort includes SDG4 (Sustainable Development Goal 4) which has the agenda of Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Current Director-General of UNESCO, Audrey Azoulay said, Literacy is the foundation of learning, and it plays a vital role in reducing inequalities. When people are empowered through literacy, they can engage with their communities, contribute to the economy, and lead fulfilling lives. In order to achieve greater success within states, opportunities for lifelong learning is vital. When generation after generation is taught and continues to learn, it leaves a legacy of bright minds and ideas that can lead to the betterment of not only ones own nation, but the world as a whole. We believe that to take a step forward in the right direction would be to align our policies along with global frameworks, some that have already been set in the UN, such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We urge each member state to discuss and promote activities that will aid in the development and furtherance of worldwide access to education that doesnt stop once you hit a certain age, but continues for a lifetime which will result in betterment of communities and states as a whole. In addition, support for technological advancement will provide access for underdeveloped areas. Therefore, we urge member states to re-edify their support for the UN policies that are already in place, as well as those that are in the process of rising up for the furtherance in the case of Literacy for Life. We must work together to achieve these literacy goals so that there can be a furtherance and abundance of bright minds that can continue to live life to the fullest through a never-ending access to education. | |
| Committee: | GA Plenary |
| Topic: | The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment |
| Paper text: | |
| We recognize the climate crisis's impact on the human right to a clean, healthy, and
sustainable environment, and we strongly support the measures the United Nations has
taken thus far. As proud constituents of the Paris Climate Agreement, we have pledged to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and will continue to do so, while supporting the UN in
encouraging other states to participate in this movement. With that being said, to make a
substantial difference we must acknowledge the dramatic effects that international
corporations have on the environment, from pollution to mass waste generation, to the
depletion of countless natural resources. We need to be able to hold these major
corporations accountable. We believe that with the support of powerful states, we can
create stronger international treaties that will ensure accountability. We urge member states
to develop public-private partnerships and promote green technology that has the potential
to benefit future economic growth.
We encourage member states to take that active stance in promoting the use of solar, wind, and other forms of clean energy, as well as providing resources to those impacted by climate crises. We recommend working towards new binding protocols to ensure better resource management and emission reductions, with the promise to promote and share clean technology and other sustainable practices. No matter where member states stand on this issue, it is undeniable that people are suffering because of it. If we come together to create a solution, we can and will create a better world. | |
| Committee: | GA Plenary |
| Topic: | Safety and security of humanitarian personnel and protection of United Nations personnel |
| Paper text: | |
| We affirm the necessity of international mediation efforts engaged by United Nations
peacekeepers, positioning UN active members as neutral and amicable moderators
without threat or malice. Additionally, we strongly support cooperation with national
actors in order to maintain and improve the safety of UN operatives. With no fewer than
eleven UN personnel killed in 2023, including four civilians, the issue of securing the lives
of our active members is the most urgent and direct threat that the personnel of the
United Nations faces.
As stewards of international peace, we must take measures to enact justice from a paradigm of neutral moderation. This involves bringing security to The major indicator of violence towards UN peacekeepers is the perception of them as enemies or controllers, largely as a result of misinformation from outside groups. By actively communicating peacekeepers roles as non-aggressors, those unwarranted motivations for violence can be dissuaded. Additionally, cooperation among member states is paramount. In accordance with Resolution 2730 (2024), we reaffirm the need for nations to investigate acts of aggression against UN personnel, and for those investigations to result in prosecution of those responsible in joint effort with the Secretary-Generals recommendation. Clear consequences for actions in opposition to peace will discourage future violence. UN Founder and former Under-Secretary-General for Special Political Affairs Sir Brian Urquhart once stated, A peacekeeping force is like a family friend who has moved into a household stricken by disaster. It must conciliate, console, and discreetly run the household without ever appearing to dominate or usurp the natural rights of those it is helping. Only through advocacy of peaceful action, alongside member state support, may our peacekeepers encourage justice internationally. | |
| Committee: | CCPCJ |
| Topic: | Equal access to justice for all |
| Paper text: | |
| We stand in firm affirmation of support for the United Nations to increase and ensure
equal access to justice for all. In addition to this, our public position during future
meetings is to increase accessibility through suggestion and adoption of legal aid
programs, and ensure equity through proposals of collective affirmation and compliance
of human rights abuse resolutions. Our country has implemented legal aid programs to
support accessibility of justice, particularly aimed at those who cannot afford the costs of
legal representation. Particularly in 2011, the modification of The Law on State-
Guaranteed Legal Aid to our Constitution, guaranteed the right to legal assistance,
exercise, and protection of rights, including the legal, free right to assistance of lawyers
and other representatives in court through the public defender system. We urge adoption
of similar legal aid programs and policies for all member states. We also recognize the
role the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice plays as the administrator
of international aid policy, as well as a fair arbiter for human rights abuse violations. We
suggest their role take increased measures of action in the treatment of prisoners without
rights to legal aid.
United Nations member states have already taken action on increasing equity of justice. We reaffirm both the International Society and our commitment to this cause by drawing attention to the results of Resolution 46/20, condemning our state for the violations of human rights following the 2020 elections. This allowed independent monitors not only access to our country, but also tightened the need for accountability in human rights abuses. We emphasize the importance of increased equity of justice regardless of political or economic stance and draw attention to the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justices ability to effectively implement similar policies wherever deemed necessary. We call the United Nations to action on the issue of accessibility of justice, particularly regarding the treatment of individuals without systemic rights to legal aid, as well as increased equity of justice through expanding the scope of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice as a fair arbiter in holding member state violations accountable. We deem this responsibility should be placed upon this Commission not only out of categorical purpose, but out of the historical success of their actions. Therefore, we urge all member states to adopt increased international collaboration in these efforts, as well as communicate methods of increasing both equity and accessibility of justice in fellow nations. | |
| Committee: | CCPCJ |
| Topic: | International cooperation in combating transnational organized crime and corruption |
| Paper text: | |
| While we are an active member of several international treaties and conventions in support of continuing to emphasize international cooperation mechanisms within the United Nations, we would like to see prioritization in facilitating regional partnerships on specific issues, such as transnational organized crime, corruption, and terrorism. Furthermore, we would like to work closely with our regional allies to find ways to combat these issues namely cybercrimeas the threats they pose are of great concern to not only us, but to our region as well. Additionally, member states in other parts of the world may differ in their opinions and viewpoints on how to best combat these issues, making the idea of facilitating regional partnerships more feasible than that of continuing to emphasize international cooperation mechanisms within the United Nations. Therefore, we urge all Member States within the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice to consider facilitating regional partnerships on the aforementioned, specific issues. | |
| Committee: | WHA |
| Topic: | Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health |
| Paper text: | |
| We recognize that the health of women, children, and adolescents is essential to a society and that the role of the family must be prioritized. We support efforts to improve member states efforts to guarantee greater access to healthcare amongst these important groups within any country. We know that the health of women, children, and adolescents is integrally tied to the health of families and communities, and we urge member states to expand their efforts to meet those health needs. | |
| Committee: | WHA |
| Topic: | Public health dimension of the world drug problem |
| Paper text: | |
| We acknowledge that the drug crisis has created a public health concern globally, and we urge member states to work to control that problem within their own countries. As member states, we must push to resolve these concerns and use evidence-based approaches to improve public health as a whole. | |
| Committee: | COI-1948 |
| Topic: | United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan |
| Paper text: | |
| On the question of the fate of Kashmir, the most important question in regard to the inhabitants of Kashmir itself is whether they would prefer to be annexed by one of the involved parties or instead, remain an independent state. If the latter was true, then in the name of popular sovereignty, what right do Pakistan or India have to rule the territory in question? Another issue that must be explored is whether the claims of Pakistani supported raiders or Indian genocide of Muslims can be independently confirmed. Of course, the greatest difficulty facing this commission is coming to a consensus on a plan of action which the involved parties find agreeable. To achieve this end, the commission must exhaust all possible resources to uncover relevant information which can be used to formulate a solution. The commission should consult witnesses and experts who have intimate knowledge about the local inhabitants and the history of Kashmir. | |
| Committee: | COI-1948 |
| Topic: | The United Nations Committee of Good Offices on the Indonesian Question |
| Paper text: | |
| One of the most pressing matters in this debacle appears to be the establishment of the United States of Indonesia (USI) since the creation of that state signals the end of the conflict between the Netherlands and the Republic of Indonesia. The most important question is whether or not this commission can get both parties to agree to establish the USI at the earliest possible date thereby ending the hostilities between the two parties. The willingness of the two parties to work toward such a solution poses the greatest challenge to this commission. One possible course of action to remedy this is to explore the possibility of demilitarization. If this can be achieved, tensions can be eased and prospects improved so that both parties can come to a consensus. On another note, it might be worth salvaging certain aspects of the Linggadjati Agreement in formulating a brand-new agreement that both sides find satisfactory. In terms of witnesses and experts the commission should call upon, they should have knowledge pertaining to matters of the military and the creation of the USI. These witnesses should be able to provide information that would answer questions about the USI and demilitarization. | |
Back to the list of countries